Featured Image

Tariffs: They’re a Big Deal

Can tariffs safeguard American jobs, combat foreign competition, and boost U.S. manufacturing? The incoming president is bringing this hot topic back into political focus. So, what do tariffs mean, are they truly beneficial, and what's AMT's stance?
Nov 19, 2024

During the 2024 presidential campaign, President-elect Donald Trump emphasized tariffs as a way to safeguard American jobs, combat foreign competition, and boost U.S. manufacturing. While it remains unclear how his administration will implement tariff policies, the debate about their role in global trade continues to stir controversy.

With so much attention returning to the topic, we explore what tariffs do, perspectives from economists, some pros and cons, and AMT – The Association For Manufacturing Technology’s stance on how best to use them.

Economic Skepticism and Short-Term Benefits

Tariffs are taxes on imported goods, often used by governments to protect domestic industries, address trade imbalances, or respond to unfair trade practices.

Economists are typically skeptical of tariffs, seeing them as tools that can offer short-term protection but often lead to longer-term economic inefficiencies. While tariffs can help shield certain industries from foreign competition, they tend to increase costs for consumers and disrupt the global flow of goods. In the long run, tariffs can undermine the industries they aim to protect by raising production costs and stifling innovation.

One key concern is the risk of retaliation. When a country imposes tariffs, others often respond with their own, creating a cycle of escalating trade barriers. This was seen in the ongoing U.S.-China trade dispute, which resulted in higher prices and market uncertainty, harming both American consumers and global trade. A 2019 study by the Federal Reserve Board found that the tariffs imposed on China in 2018 caused reductions in manufacturing employment and increases in producer prices. For manufacturing employment, a small boost from the import protection afforded by tariffs was more than offset by rising production costs and retaliatory tariffs.

Tariffs as a Bargaining Chip

Governments sometimes use tariffs strategically as leverage in international negotiations. Trump, for example, has suggested imposing tariffs on imports from Mexico unless the Mexican government takes more decisive action to control migration across the U.S. southern border. However, many industries today depend on complex global supply chains, where components are sourced from multiple countries. Tariffs can disrupt these supply chains, increasing production costs and delaying deliveries, hurting both businesses and consumers.

Protecting Domestic Industries and Generating Revenue

One argument in favor of tariffs is their potential to protect domestic industries, particularly those that are emerging or struggling to compete against foreign imports. By raising the price of imported goods, tariffs can make domestic products more competitive, helping to preserve jobs and even create new ones in sectors like manufacturing. However, these protections often come at a cost. Industries that rely on imported components face higher production costs, eroding their competitiveness and leading to job losses in other sectors.

Additionally, tariffs can be a significant source of government revenue. This income can be used to fund public services, infrastructure projects, or even tax cuts, as Trump has proposed to extend the 2017 tax cuts. However, the revenue generated by tariffs is often offset by higher prices for consumers. As businesses pass on the increased cost of imported goods, consumers face higher prices for essential items like food, electronics, and clothing. This reduction in purchasing power can contribute to inflation, harming the economy in the process.

National Security and Strategic Use of Tariffs

In some cases, tariffs are justified on national security grounds. For instance, governments impose tariffs to protect industries critical to defense, such as advanced manufacturing and technology. They can also counteract unfair trade practices, such as dumping, where foreign countries sell goods at prices below market value to gain a competitive edge. In these cases, tariffs are tools to ensure fairness and protect vital national interests.

As an alternative, non-tariff barriers – such as quotas or voluntary export restraints – can address trade imbalances. For example, in 1986, President Ronald Reagan’s administration, responding to a petition filed by AMT (then NMTBA), negotiated voluntary restraint agreements with Japan and Taiwan on machine tool imports, citing national security risks. These types of agreements are less disruptive than tariffs but still achieve similar goals.

Balancing Protection and Free Trade

In general, tariffs tend to have a negative economic impact by distorting markets and reducing global trade. While they may serve a strategic purpose, such as protecting vital industries or countering unfair trade practices, as well as provide short-term relief from foreign competition, they often result in lower productivity, price increases, and retaliatory action. Conversely, economists widely agree that free trade with minimal interference from tariffs drives economic growth and improves welfare by allowing countries to specialize in their strengths while offering consumers lower prices and greater choice.

AMT’s Final Thoughts

AMT believes targeted tariffs should be used cautiously and sparingly – primarily as a last resort to address a specific short-term goal or challenge. Rather than relying on unilateral tariff measures, the emphasis should be on pursuing multilateral trade agreements that open markets and reduce barriers, fostering a global trading environment that benefits all parties involved. As the global economy becomes increasingly interconnected, the challenge will be finding a balance between protecting national interests and promoting free trade, ensuring that the benefits of globalization are widely shared without harming long-term economic growth.

PicturePicture
Author
Amber Thomas
Vice President, Advocacy
Recent advocacy News
On September 5, 2024, the U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) published an interim final rule implementing export controls on critical and emerging technologies that align with the regulations of U.S. allies.
Recently, the Biden Administration announced several science and technology initiatives centered on key digital technologies and manufacturing. Get the latest updates on how digital twin, AI, semiconductor manufacturing, and EV production will be affected.
President Biden’s recent State of the Union address and Fiscal Year 2025 budget proposal signal potential tax hikes. What are the implications for manufacturing competitiveness and economic strategy?
Last fall, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued two rules relating to toxic substances that significantly impact manufacturers and suppliers. Learn about these guidelines affecting PIP (3:1) and PFAS – and how they affect your business.
Policy makers came together at The MFG Meeting 2023 to share data and insights on policy-making actions of concern to manufacturers. Here are seven key takeaways that may impact your manufacturing business.
Similar News
undefined
Intelligence
By Christopher Chidzik | Dec 11, 2024

Shipments of cutting tools, measured by the Cutting Tool Market Report compiled by AMT and USCTI, totaled $212.5 million in October 2024, a 12.6% increase from September 2024 but down 0.2% from October 2023. Year-to-date shipments totaled $2.07 billion.

4 min
undefined
Intelligence
By Christopher Chidzik | Dec 09, 2024

Orders of manufacturing technology, measured by the USMTO report published by AMT, totaled $385 million in October 2024, a 14.5% decrease from September. Year-to-date orders reached $3.74 billion, a decline of 7.5% compared to the first 10 months of 2023.

5 min
undefined
Intelligence
By Catherine “Cat” Ross | Dec 04, 2024

Women in Manufacturing tour HEIDENHAIN plant. Wes-Tech partners with the Reshoring Initiative. Leadership appointments at Caron Engineering. ITAR renewal by MSK Precision Products. A new RFI solicitation for advancing metal alloy systems led by NCDMM.

7 min